This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GSL project.
[REVISED] Re: first (very crude) stab at an abstract
- To: gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
- Subject: [REVISED] Re: first (very crude) stab at an abstract
- From: Les Schaffer <godzilla@netmeg.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:03:21 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <76emg2hopc.fsf@odie.lanl.gov><767lluhm0s.fsf@odie.lanl.gov>
- Reply-To: godzilla@netmeg.net (Les Schaffer)
Mark Galassi said:
> Some specific requirements are that GSL must (in no particular
> order) (a) be free software (sometimes called open source software),
> and in particular it is distributed under the GNU General Public
> Licence (GPL);
i am thoroughly confused.
Brian Gough last week said: " As for government labs endorsing free
software, that is a potential can of worms."
how does this square with GSL being GPL (dude)??????
les
--
____ Les Schaffer ___| --->> Engineering R&D <<---
Theoretical & Applied Mechanics | Designspring, Inc.
Center for Radiophysics & Space Research | http://www.designspring.com/
Cornell Univ. schaffer@tam.cornell.edu | les@designspring.com