This is the mail archive of the
glibc-cvs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
GNU C Library master sources branch master updated. glibc-2.25-615-ge4043b8
- From: jsm28 at sourceware dot org
- To: glibc-cvs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 27 Jun 2017 17:12:48 -0000
- Subject: GNU C Library master sources branch master updated. glibc-2.25-615-ge4043b8
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".
The branch, master has been updated
via e4043b84c49e1cf9bcf1e8320233343ecc34f8eb (commit)
from f8f72bc0c3da8ba039e6a1ed670ca576120b1f85 (commit)
Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4043b84c49e1cf9bcf1e8320233343ecc34f8eb
commit e4043b84c49e1cf9bcf1e8320233343ecc34f8eb
Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date: Tue Jun 27 17:12:13 2017 +0000
Fix strftime build with GCC 8.
Building with current GCC mainline fails with:
strftime_l.c: In function '__strftime_internal':
strftime_l.c:719:4: error: macro expands to multiple statements [-Werror=multistatement-macros]
digits = d > width ? d : width; \
^
strftime_l.c:1260:6: note: in expansion of macro 'DO_NUMBER'
DO_NUMBER (1, tp->tm_year + TM_YEAR_BASE);
^~~~~~~~~
strftime_l.c:1259:4: note: some parts of macro expansion are not guarded by this 'else' clause
else
^~~~
In fact this particular instance is harmless; the code looks like:
if (modifier == L_('O'))
goto bad_format;
else
DO_NUMBER (1, tp->tm_year + TM_YEAR_BASE);
and because of the goto, it doesn't matter that part of the expansion
isn't under the "else" conditional. But it's also clearly bad style
to rely on that. This patch changes DO_NUMBER and DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD
to use do { } while (0) to avoid such problems.
Tested (full testsuite) for x86_64 (GCC 6), and with
build-many-glibcs.py with GCC mainline, in conjunction with my libgcc
patch <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg02032.html>.
* time/strftime_l.c (DO_NUMBER): Define using do { } while (0).
(DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD): Likewise.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index ad24611..6ed7f08 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2017-06-27 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
+
+ * time/strftime_l.c (DO_NUMBER): Define using do { } while (0).
+ (DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD): Likewise.
+
2017-06-27 Prakhar Bahuguna <prakhar.bahuguna@arm.com>
* sysdeps/arm/armv7/multiarch/Makefile: Add memchr_neon to
diff --git a/time/strftime_l.c b/time/strftime_l.c
index 439b971..b5ba9ca 100644
--- a/time/strftime_l.c
+++ b/time/strftime_l.c
@@ -715,12 +715,22 @@ __strftime_internal (CHAR_T *s, size_t maxsize, const CHAR_T *format,
format_char = *f;
switch (format_char)
{
-#define DO_NUMBER(d, v) \
- digits = d > width ? d : width; \
- number_value = v; goto do_number
-#define DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD(d, v) \
- digits = d > width ? d : width; \
- number_value = v; goto do_number_spacepad
+#define DO_NUMBER(d, v) \
+ do \
+ { \
+ digits = d > width ? d : width; \
+ number_value = v; \
+ goto do_number; \
+ } \
+ while (0)
+#define DO_NUMBER_SPACEPAD(d, v) \
+ do \
+ { \
+ digits = d > width ? d : width; \
+ number_value = v; \
+ goto do_number_spacepad; \
+ } \
+ while (0)
case L_('%'):
if (modifier != 0)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
ChangeLog | 5 +++++
time/strftime_l.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
GNU C Library master sources