This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/22848] ca_ES: update date definitions from CLDR


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22848

--- Comment #22 from Robert Buj <rbuj at fedoraproject dot org> ---
(In reply to Robert Buj from comment #21)
> (In reply to Egmont Koblinger from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Robert Buj from comment #18)
> > 
> > > > 2. Do I see correctly that you have sacrificed ab_alt_mon for the correct
> > > > alignment of ls -l? Maybe ls should be fixed if a genitive preposition "de"
> > > > or "d’" is obligatory in Catalan.
> > 
> > I'm curious now :) When the month name is abbreviated, is it still
> > desired/preferred/obligatory/etc. to keep that "de" or "d'", or is it okay
> > to omit that (use nominative instead of genivite) as part of abbreviating?
> 
> LLL = ab_alt_mon
> (http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/summary/ca.html#1751)
> MMM = ab_mon http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts/latest/summary/ca.html#1739
> 
> In a standard date, if the month is abbreviated, it should be written with
> "de" or "d'" when it's preceded by the day number for Catalan. However, you
> can also write the date with abbreviated month using a flexible form (not
> standard) without "de" or "d'".
> 
> Regarding to ´ls -l´, the abbreviated month can be written without "de" or
> "d'"as part of abbreviating.

I think the you can understand my trouble when I saw that June and July were
printed in the same way "de ju" "de ju" for Catalan due to the abbreviated
month width constraint in ls -l.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]