This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug math/22410] [powerpc64le] iseqsig (long double, _Float128) broken on powerpc64le
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:35:26 +0000
- Subject: [Bug math/22410] [powerpc64le] iseqsig (long double, _Float128) broken on powerpc64le
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-22410-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22410
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
I'm doubtful that this is a bug in glibc rather than in TS 18661-3. Why
should iseqsig be valid when a comparison using == wouldn't be? Raised
with WG14: <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/14885>.
(If this use of comparison macros should be invalid, it implies there's a
quality-of-implementation bug in GCC: such comparisons using e.g.
__builtin_isless should be diagnosed in cases where uses of the comparison
operators would be diagnosed.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.