This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/21806] Wrong LC_NAME in Arabic Locals


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21806

Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Wei-Lun Chao from comment #4)
> After checking ar_* I found:
> 
> ar_EG:
> name_fmt    "<U0025><U0070><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066><U0025><U0074>/
> <U0025><U0067>"
> 
> ar_SA:
> name_fmt    "<U0025><U0064><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0067><U0025><U0074>/
> <U0025><U006D><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066>"
> 
> Which one is correct, or both? Arabic as a macro-language may have the same
> problem like Chinese.

Yes, I think the same.

I don’t want to apply this change to all Arabic locales, there 
could be differences between the Arabic locales, we would need
to have better references. I guess it is quite likely that these
strings should be different for different Arabic locales.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]