This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/20639] New: Inconsistency in definitions of fputwc(), putwc() and putwchar() in glibc
- From: "igor.liferenko at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 02:09:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/20639] New: Inconsistency in definitions of fputwc(), putwc() and putwchar() in glibc
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20639
Bug ID: 20639
Summary: Inconsistency in definitions of fputwc(), putwc() and
putwchar() in glibc
Product: glibc
Version: 2.23
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: igor.liferenko at gmail dot com
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi all,
fputwc(), putwc() and putwchar() take argument of type wchar_t instead of
wint_t. This causes GCC to issue warnings.
This is the example for putwchar(). Compile with "gcc -Wconversion bug.c"
#include <locale.h>
#include <wchar.h>
int main(void)
{
setlocale(LC_CTYPE, "en_US.UTF-8");
putwchar(getwchar());
return 0;
}
This is the output:
bug.c: In function ‘main’:
bug.c:6:12: warning: conversion to ‘wchar_t {aka int}’ from ‘wint_t {aka
unsigned int}’ may change the sign of the result [-Wsign-conversion]
putwchar(getwchar());
^~~~~~~~
I know that wint_t and wchar_t are identical, but function interfaces should be
fixed to remove compiler warnings.
Regards,
Igor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.