This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug dynamic-link/20019] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault
- From: "fweimer at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:27:48 +0000
- Subject: [Bug dynamic-link/20019] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-20019-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20019
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fweimer at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> ---
We should also consider this:
It is never correct not to link against libc.so.6 if you reference symbols from
libc.so.6. The static linker has to process these symbols to apply the correct
symbol versions, otherwise the object will not have symbol versions and bind to
compatibility symbols, which do not match what is in headers.
H.J., does your object file reference a versioned memmove symbol?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.