This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug string/18858] _HAVE_STRING_ARCH_xxx aren't defined for i386 nor x86_64
- From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:56:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug string/18858] _HAVE_STRING_ARCH_xxx aren't defined for i386 nor x86_64
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-18858-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18858
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #3)
> (In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> > I think _HAVE_STRING_ARCH_mempcpy is expected to be defined only when
> > mempcpy is an alternative entry point to memcpy, as otherwise using
> > mempcpy will increase cache usage and so inlining the expansion in terms
> > of memcpy is expected to be more efficient.
>
> I think this needs to be backed up by some more performance measurements by
> Intel.
Did we have inline mempcpy performance measurements on Intel machines when
the change was made?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.