This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug math/18594] New: cexp, ccos, ccosh, csin, csinh spurious underflows
- From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:31:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug math/18594] New: cexp, ccos, ccosh, csin, csinh spurious underflows
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18594
Bug ID: 18594
Summary: cexp, ccos, ccosh, csin, csinh spurious underflows
Product: glibc
Version: 2.21
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: math
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
cexp, ccos, ccosh, csin and csinh have spurious underflows in cases where they
compute sin of the smallest normal, that produces an underflow exception
(depending on which sin implementation is in use) but the final result does not
underflow. ctan may also have such underflows, or they may be latent (the
issue there is that e.g. ctan (DBL_MIN) should, rounded upwards, be the next
double value above DBL_MIN, which under glibc's accuracy goals may not have an
underflow exception, but the intermediate computation of sin (DBL_MIN) would
legitimately underflow on before-rounding architectures).
For example, for float on x86_64:
Failure: Real part of: ccos_downward (0x4p-128 + 0x1p+0 i): Exception
"Underflow" set
Failure: Real part of: ccosh_downward (0x1p+0 + 0x4p-128 i): Exception
"Underflow" set
Failure: Real part of: cexp_downward (0x1p+0 + 0x4p-128 i): Exception
"Underflow" set
Failure: Real part of: csin_downward (-0x4p-128 + 0x1p+0 i): Exception
"Underflow" set
Failure: Real part of: csinh_downward (0x1p+0 + 0x4p-128 i): Exception
"Underflow" set
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.