This is the mail archive of the glibc-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug malloc/17581] malloc_usable_size: expected 7 but got 11


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17581

--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "GNU C Library master sources".

The branch, master has been updated
       via  265cbed8e73b23e3b38ada6cc42482c53a216224 (commit)
      from  85bae5a160e288fa85eab8a5d1b0b227ab20798a (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;h=265cbed8e73b23e3b38ada6cc42482c53a216224

commit 265cbed8e73b23e3b38ada6cc42482c53a216224
Author: James Lemke <jwlemke@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Tue May 19 12:10:26 2015 -0700

    Fix for test "malloc_usable_size: expected 7 but got 11"

    [BZ #17581] The checking chain of unused chunks was terminated by a hash of
        the block pointer, which was sometimes confused with the chunk length
byte.
        We now avoid using a length byte equal to the magic byte.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 ChangeLog      |    9 ++++++++
 NEWS           |   16 +++++++-------
 malloc/hooks.c |   62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]