This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug network/9981] getaddrinfo(NULL) with AI_PASSIVE returns 0.0.0.0 (IPv4-only) and :: (IPv6+IPv4) in this order
- From: "neleai at seznam dot cz" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 01:09:39 +0000
- Subject: [Bug network/9981] getaddrinfo(NULL) with AI_PASSIVE returns 0.0.0.0 (IPv4-only) and :: (IPv6+IPv4) in this order
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-9981-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9981
--- Comment #8 from Ondrej Bilka <neleai at seznam dot cz> ---
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:52:45AM +0000, aoliva at sourceware dot org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9981
>
> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at sourceware dot org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |aoliva at sourceware dot org
>
> --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at sourceware dot org> ---
> Created attachment 7624
> --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7624&action=edit
> Don't sort passive localhost addresses, so that IPv6+IPvv4 remains first and
> IPv4-only, last
>
> I don't think it ever makes any sense for us to ever try to sort passive
> addresses: we always generate them IPv6+IPv4 first and IPv4-only last, with at
> most two adresses and possibly only one if we asked for a specific family.
> Since the former is always preferred, it doesn't make sense to try to sort
> them.
>
> The only doubt is whether to generate both when the first covers both; I'm not
> when dropping the latter is safe, so I'm leaving that unrelated decision out
> for now.
>
> Any reason to not go with this patch?
>
Possible, you should send this to libc-alpha to get comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.