This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/15648] multiple definition of `__lll_lock_wait_private'
- From: "jakub at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:58:47 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/15648] multiple definition of `__lll_lock_wait_private'
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-15648-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15648
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Neil from comment #8)
> If ld include libc-lowlevellock.o first, it always cause error when
> includeing lowlevellock.o. Right?
But why does that happen?
You link -lc before -lpthread? That is never going to work properly when
linking the libraries statically.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.