This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug build/13844] `nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/libc-lowlevellock.c' missing in glibc sources
- From: "carlos at systemhalted dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:51:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug build/13844] `nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc32/libc-lowlevellock.c' missing in glibc sources
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-13844-131@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13844
Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
CC| |davem at davemloft dot net
Ever Confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #1 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org> 2012-03-14 15:51:23 UTC ---
(1) I've added Dave Miller (Sparc maintainer) to the CC.
(2) Please follow "What to put in a report":
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html
(3) No architecture needs to provide libc-lowlevellock.c. The normal sysdep
override mechanism should have selected the sparc32 version of lowlevellock.c
*unless* your configure options failed to cause the selection of sparc32. Given
that you have not provided a full report we don't know why sparc32 was not
selected.
Please include the full log of running `./configure ...` since that will
contain which sysdep directories were selected and in what override order.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.