[Bug libc/10062] 'make' for glibc-2.9 fails even though 'configure' is OK

["sergstesh at yahoo dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From sergstesh at yahoo dot com  2009-04-11 23:35 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> There is nothing wrong.  There are lots of people constantly compiling glibc
> correctly.  This means your environment doesn't match the supported one.  Stuop
> wasting people's time.  You're apparently not able to do any work on glibc so
stop.

Do you understand English ?

I have made a number of statements which you so far failed to disprove or at
least to meaningfully comment. Let me summarize the statements for you:

1) I did read the INSTALL file before trying;
2) the INSTALL file say nothing about specifying architecture - TRUE or FALSE ?
3) in the vast majority of typical cases there is no need to specify
architecture for native builds - TRUE or FALSE ?
4) as my experiments show, both '-march=i586' and '-march=native -mtune=native'
work, which suggests 'configure' has severe problems with guessing correctly,
i.e. instead of correctly guessing the default like with majority of other FOSS
packages in case of 'glibc' user has to specify the architecture explicitly, and
this defeats 'configure' purpose.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10062

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.