This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 09/28/2016 06:32 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Not sure I can mimic Linux format exactly. At least I have another set of registers in use (VMX of Intel x86 arch are involved). May be it's critical, may be not... Any way, Linux code was the first thing I looked at. So my way is "mimic as close as possible, adapt as few as possible". Thanks for confirmation that it is one of possible ways to solve my problem =)On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:18:35 +0200, Nikolay Martyanov wrote:Idea is very similar to `kdump`, you are right. But instead of Linux kernel I have a hypervisor running on a bare-metal. So, in some point of view, I try to implement my own kdump. And it will dump not Linux kernel mem, but mem of hypervisor.OK, so core files are not standardized the way executables+shlibs are by the standards of ELF-generic and ELF-x86_64 or ELF-x86 addons. You can either invent your own format (based on ELF or not) or - what I suggest - is to just mimic the Linux kernel process format.
And in case I can't mimic it for 100%, I have to make several adaptations in GDB. The details were listed in my first message.
Still hoping someone can comment on them Thanks, Nikolay
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |