Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not?

[Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>]

On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:43:51 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
[...]
> maybe, we can start from something easy and less-controvesy,
> 
> On 04/05/2012 04:47 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > 1. Modify GDB so it can be compiled with -Wc++-compat.
> >    This would be the first patch series.  There is already an archer
> >    branch for this.
> 
> Modify GDB as well as GDBserver/IPA so they can be compiled with
> -Wc++-compat.
> 
> > 2. Then, change GDB to compile with a C++ compiler (-Wc++-compat is
> >    not complete).  This would be the second patch series.
> > 
> 
> Change to use C++ compiler to compile GDB, GDBserver and IPA.  If this
> is too aggressive, we can use C++ compiler to compile GDB and keep C
> compiler to compiler GDBserver and IPA.  Sources in gdb/common/ will be
> compiled by C compiler and C++ compiler respectively.  Is it possible?

For one of the justifications of C++
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2012-11/msg00070.html
speficially to upstream the 64-bit inferior offsets/sizes as present in many
patches posted by Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>:

It would be enough to have GDB (neither gdbserver nor IPA) compilable as C++.
Explicit configure option would be required.  It would be used to create the
64-bit offsets patch and then also during nightly regression testing to catch
possible following 64-bit offsets type violations/regressions.


Is it enough plan to justify the -Wc++-compat compatibility step?
That is to update and check-in archer-ratmice-compile-Wc++-compat.


Thanks,
Jan