This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI Interface - interpretation of value returned by -stack-list-locals (C++)
- From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji at seketeli dot org>
- To: BarrRobot <robert at rwall dot plus dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:50:24 +0200
- Subject: Re: MI Interface - interpretation of value returned by -stack-list-locals (C++)
- References: <31246347.post@talk.nabble.com> <m38vvyotxo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <31268868.post@talk.nabble.com> <m34o6kogy6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Hello BarrRobot,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> a Ãcrit:
>>>>>> ">" == BarrRobot <robert@rwall.plus.com> writes:
>
>>> Thanks. It would have been nice to avoid the round trip of another call (or
>>> many) to do all the necessary varobjs, so it looks as if I shall chicken out
>>> and present it 'as is' for expediency at this stage.
>>> One for the wish-list maybe?
>
> Please file a feature request in bugzilla.
> The more detailed you can be, the better.
Just out of curiosity, Have you filled an enhancement request for this
yet? [A quick search in bugzilla hasn't yield anything for me]. I have
also taken the route of creating one varobj per local variable in my MI
client. It works great, but at this point I feel like any round trip
that could be saved can actually make a user visible difference :-) So
if you haven't filed anything yet, I'll file one.
Thanks.
--
Dodji