This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product

From: Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:44:46 +0200
Subject: Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product
References: <4C9E6B57.8030509@netscape.net> <m239sx75ue.fsf@igel.home> <4C9E8950.2050808@netscape.net> <20100925235622.GP3044@adacore.com>
Reply-to: LpSolit at netscape dot net

Le 26. 09. 10 01:56, Joel Brobecker a écrit :
> Do you have the old GNATS PRs? We can compute
> the new PR numbers using: PR-bugzilla = PR-gnats + 7105.

Those marked as duplicate do not have the bug ID in the comment, so I
don't know where they should point to. And there are several bugs with:

State-Changed-Why: pr gdb/NNN is a premature version of pr gdb/MMM.

Does it mean such bugs should be closed as INVALID?

References:
- Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product
  - From: Frédéric Buclin
- Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product
  - From: FrÃdÃric Buclin
- Re: Closed bugs with no resolution in the 'gdb' product
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]