This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Static/dynamic userspace/kernel trace


Dominique Toupin <dominique.toupin@ericsson.com> writes:

> I agree that GDB could use a better ptrace.

Right.  And since ptrace proper is needed as a backward compatibility
measure, the kernel will in turn need something to multiplex/arbitrate
between the different interfaces.  So this is how we came to utrace
years ago.

> Regarding tracing, for me the main use case is to get the data out
> of the system very fast and with very low overhead [...]

Understood.  That same approach underlies other tracing/performance
tools.  For systemtap, this has been more of an asymptotic case:
something it can do too, with other tools providing some tough-to-beat
performance (and sometimes usability) benchmarks.

- FChE


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]