This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb at sourceware dot org, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:47:39 +0000
Subject: Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
References: <20100201081928.GA9204@adacore.com> <m3eikrsk8p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20100212051007.GI2919@adacore.com>

On Friday 12 February 2010 05:10:07, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> The following diff is the workaround that sounds the simplest.
> I will test it on my end, but I'm not certain of the quality of my C++
> compiler (I remember getting more FAILs than I think I should). Anyone
> wants to test it? ?I want to apply the workaround immediately after
> I created the branch so that I can create the first pre-release right
> after.

How far are we from getting the expr-cumulative branch
merged?  If it's not getting in soon after branching, then
I'd suggest applying the workaround before branching, so that
we don't fix a crash in 7.1 and leave it regressing in mainline.
We can always revert the workaround when or before the
expr-cumulative stuff goes in.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [gdb-7.1] 10 days to branching...
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]