This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Jim Ingham <jingham at apple dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:09:24 -0500
Subject: Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
References: <27535106.post@talk.nabble.com> <27542787.post@talk.nabble.com> <m3ocjvsll2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1CF86F7D-0B47-47D7-A6E2-24853D50653D@apple.com>

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:03:08AM -0800, Jim Ingham wrote:
> It sounds like the STL code got inlined?  Then next would also step
> in, since gdb doesn't see inlined functions as new frames.

Maybe your GDB doesn't :-P  GDB 7.0 does support inlined functions -
if your compiler outputs correct DWARF, at least.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Jim Ingham

References:
- GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: mweglicki8208
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: mweglicki8208
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: GDB steping into STL Headers.
  - From: Jim Ingham

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]