This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"?

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb at sourceware dot org
Cc: Stan Shebs <stan at codesourcery dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:04:25 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"?
References: <4B5106CB.5060204@codesourcery.com> <20100118064348.GA1914@adacore.com> <4B54AC04.7090204@codesourcery.com>

I vote for "actionpoint".  It's standardized by HPD, for what
that's worth, and used by at least one other major debugger to
represent the same thing being proposed here.  This is just a
name afterall, people get used to all kinds of names with no
effort, even though in this case "action point" actually makes
sense.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- [RFC] "actionpoints"?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"?
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [RFC] "actionpoints"?
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]