This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com, msnyder at vmware dot com
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:47:38 -0600
Subject: Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
References: <4ACFD8B7.4090902@vmware.com> <200910101950.27107.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83d44vjaiy.fsf@gnu.org> <200910131509.40897.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Reply-to: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> Since Michael has committed his patch meanwhile, in the
Pedro> interest of moving a bit forward, how 'bout we give this a
Pedro> try, then?  No new warnings caught on an
Pedro> 'x86_64-linux --enable-targets=all' at -O2 build.

Do it.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: A strange gcc behavior, and an argument against -Wno-unused
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]