This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gdb at sourceware dot org" <gdb at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:30:58 -0700
Subject: Re: Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db
References: <4ACA9270.3020205@vmware.com> <200910060149.26230.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:

On Tuesday 06 October 2009 01:42:24, Michael Snyder wrote:
These were written under the "all-stop" convention, but the comments
are no longer true, is it not so?
So, async/nonstop guys -- do we need to do anything about this?
AFAIK, these callbacks weren't really used by glibc.  Has that
changed recently?


Probably not.  I was just looking at the code, not actually
running or debugging it.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: Potential problem between non-stop and linux-thread-db
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]