This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Process record AMD64 patches got soem FAIL with testsuite
It works very well. It's so great! Thanks.
Hui
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:36, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>
>> make check RUNTESTFLAGS="solib-reverse.exp --target_board=precord"
>>
>> FAIL: gdb.reverse/solib-reverse.exp: reverse-step third sleep
>
> Hui, try adding the attached patch to your amd64 patch.
> I think it should fix your "solib-reverse.exp" fails, and
> it causes no regressions in the rest of the testsuite.
>
> With this and the two testsuite changes that I made this week,
> you should have no more reverse-debugging testsuite fails for
> amd64.
>
> Michael
>
>
> Index: amd64-linux-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.25
> diff -u -p -r1.25 amd64-linux-tdep.c
> --- amd64-linux-tdep.c ?2 Jul 2009 17:25:52 -0000 ? ? ? 1.25
> +++ amd64-linux-tdep.c ?16 Jul 2009 02:40:57 -0000
> @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ amd64_linux_init_abi (struct gdbarch_inf
> ? set_gdbarch_fetch_tls_load_module_address (gdbarch,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?svr4_fetch_objfile_link_map);
>
> + ?/* GNU/Linux uses SVR4-style shared libraries. ?*/
> + ?set_gdbarch_skip_trampoline_code (gdbarch, find_solib_trampoline_target);
> +
> ? /* Displaced stepping. ?*/
> ? set_gdbarch_displaced_step_copy_insn (gdbarch,
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? amd64_displaced_step_copy_insn);
>
>