This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Pedro, What do you think about this one? 2009-05-17 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Remove the static of it. (i386_gdbarch_init): Remove the set_gdbarch_process_record. * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): New extern. * i386-linux-tdep.c (i386_linux_init_abi): Call set_gdbarch_process_record. Sorry for my always understand your mean so slow. :) Thanks, Hui On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 00:35, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Saturday 16 May 2009 10:51:42, Hui Zhu wrote: >> Sorry. ?I made a mistake in gdbarch.sh. >> How about this one? > > There's no need for a new gdbarch method if you > implement what I suggested before: > > ?http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-05/msg00267.html > >> >> Thanks, >> Hui >> >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 17:27, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 05:09:12PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote: >> >> Hi Andi, >> >> >> >> Thanks for remind me. >> >> I make a patch for it. ?But I don't have a x86-64 close to me now. >> >> Could you help me test it? >> > >> > Gets >> > >> > ../../src/gdb/gdbarch.c:648: internal-error: verify_gdbarch: the following are invalid ... >> > ? ? ? ?support_process_record >> > A problem internal to GDB has been detected, >> > further debugging may prove unreliable. >> > >> > at startup. I haven't tried further. >> > >> > -Andi >> > >> > > > > -- > Pedro Alves >
Attachment:
prec_move_to_target.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |