This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB

From: David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>
To: ebotcazou at adacore dot com
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
References: <20090121110847.GU5709@adacore.com> <200901211237.n0LCb2wB017368@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200901211522.19829.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:22:19 +0100

> > Obviously the GCC folks broke backwards compatibility with themselves.
> > So unless we find evidence that contradicts the wiki page you cite, I
> > think GCC needs to be fixed.
> 
> Yes, the SVR4 definition used to be masked by that of the sol2.h file on 
> Solaris and is not anymore.  But the SVR4 definition is the one used for
> the various BSD variants.

Ok, so it seems the fix is to reinstate the override in sol2.h,
right?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]