This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gnats -> bugzilla

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Gdb List <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 16:40:41 -0400
Subject: Re: gnats -> bugzilla
References: <m34p825upo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20080609200423.GL14816@adacore.com> <je1w36xsgj.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 10:29:32PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:
> 
> >> If you have any objections, speak up.
> >
> > My only concern is that we have references to bug numbers in our
> > sources as well as inside our testsuite. Are we going to replace
> > these references with the new numbers?
> 
> If the bugs are renumbered with a constant offset that is greater than
> the biggest gnats number in use then you can easily identify them and
> map them to the new bz number.

Right.  That's what I had in mind - there are more bugs currently in
the sourceware bugzilla than there are in GDB's GNATS.  We can put a
note in testsuite/README and maybe the GDB internals manual too.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- gnats -> bugzilla
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: gnats -> bugzilla
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: gnats -> bugzilla
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]