This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 6.8 release process created!
- From: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:20:45 +1300
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 6.8 release process created!
- References: <announce.20080229183523.GC25865@adacore.com> <ud4qekc8t.fsf@gnu.org>
> It builds okay, and yields the results below for "make check":
>
> === gdb Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 11833
> # of unexpected failures 73
> # of unexpected successes 2
> # of expected failures 43
> # of known failures 39
> # of untested testcases 10
> # of unsupported tests 49
>
> If someone wants to know details about some specific test cases, I
> have the data available, just holler.
That seems like a lot of failures. Are any of these the ones Vladimir
pointed out?:
FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: continue to printf
FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: send SIGUSR1
FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: signal sent
FAIL: gdb.cp/annota2.exp: continue to exit
FAIL: gdb.cp/annota2.exp: watch triggered on a.x
He says:
> JFYI -- I'm not sure we should bother about annotations.
If that's to wind me up - that's fine, I probably can't expect any more,
but I hope it's not GDB policy.
In this particular case, it's not a problem because Emacs doesn't use
frames-invalid annotations - but it does use others.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob