This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:23:16 +0200
Subject: Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands
References: <20061101202811.GA20484@nevyn.them.org> <200611012255.kA1Mtnq5021717@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061101230623.GA26112@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:06:23 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> Mark, Eli, how do you feel about using both "restart" and "setup"? 
> While they're the same action in GDB internals, I think they're
> different actions from the user's point of view.

"setup" is too general, IMO.

OTOH, I have no problems with "create-process" or "create-inferior" or
"init-inferior" or "reinit-inferior".

References:
- [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]