This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: core regs vs. proc-service regs mess
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:32:50 -0400
> It's .reg-xfp; created by bfd/elf.c:elfcore_grok_prxfpreg.
> No point testing gdbarch for NULL; it won't be. Also, I think
> gdbarch_regset_from_core_section_p is enough. If that returns NULL,
> then skip the regset. We don't need to cater to incomplete
> implementations of the core functions.
> Oh, and GDB prefers not to use assignments in if statements.
> But otherwise, yeah, this is what I had in mind. Thanks.
Thanks for the feedback.
Can I get approval for the Linux/Sparc dwarf2 bit I posted yesterday?
I want to get that in first, then I'll finish up a final version of
these core regs changes.
Also, I haven't gotten approval for that one-liner break.exp fix
I posted the other day which we discussed in depth a few days
If I could get an ACK or NACK on that I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks a lot!