This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fwd: -Wpointer-sign for GCC 4.1
On 1/18/06, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> Nah - my plan is to forget the whole thing if we decide to, but no one
> wants to decide.
I think we should encourage the use of gdb_byte for binary blobs in
new code (say, at patch review time). But it sounds like you estimate
there's still a ways to go to get target-specific code in line. Since
this concurrence between you and Eli:
>> Shall we discard the remaining (more minor) cases and turn off this
>> warning?
>
>I think so, yes. We have better uses for our energy right now.
wasn't conditioned on GCC's future choices, I'm happy to join it.