Re: Maintainer policy for GDB

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>]

> Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:00:14 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> I never wanted a promise that the review of anything would be
> _finished_ within the timeout; I realize I may have been unclear about
> that.  I did want it to _start_, however - feedback on the patch from
> someone who could approve or reject it, even if they did neither. 
> 
> Having a week ACK and a month for the actual review is fine with me. 
> It meets my primary goal: clear signs of progress, or a clear path
> forward if no signs of progress are seen.  And I still mean "the start
> of the review", within that month.

Then we are very close to an agreement.  Could you perhaps post a
revised wording for MAINTAINERS, based on the discussions until now?

> It's my goal to find something that we're all minimally reluctant about
> :-)

And everybody else's, I presume.

Thanks.