This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: problem debugging assembler functions


On Thursday 14 July 2005 17:45, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:54:41PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 19:27, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > So, moving 'find_pc_line' above will reasult in extra lookup only if
> > > > - the command is stepi/nexti, or
> > > > - the first condition evaluates to true (which means we've entered
> > > >   undebuggable code)
> > > >
> > > > I have no idea is that's bad or not performance-wise, just clarifying
> > > > what's going on.
> > >
> > > Hmm, that's encouraging!  This might be a good improvement, then.
> >
> > So, is this change going in?
> >
> > I attach the patch I'm using locally for your reference.
>
> Generally nothing goes in without a patch being submitted (with
> changelog, to gdb-patches). 

Okay, I'll post the patch there.

> It sounds like you're doing a lot of work 
> on GDB; have you considered getting a copyright assignment on file?

Am I required to do so? The two patches I've sent so far are fairly trivial.

Thanks,
Volodya




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]