This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution
- From: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:04:40 -0400
- Subject: Re: [discuss] Support for reverse-execution
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:13:04AM -0400, Paul Schlie wrote:
>>> When someone implements reversible debugging in a free simulator and
>>> wants to integrate that with GDB, they'll have the choice of doing the
>>> remaining steps in their simulator or in GDB.
>>
>> - Although our views may differ, I accept and support the simple reality
>> that those to invest the time and resources in a development, have the
>> greatest say in the decisions. (In this case if the desire is to define
>> an interface for a single lone proprietary tool, likely in satisfaction or
>> natural result of a commercial commercial contract to do so, then let it
>> be; but attempting to justify it as a good thing is a bit of a stretch).
>
> Paul, I have said repeatedly in this discussion that I think this is a
> natural, valid, good interface to the functionality. That's my
> considered opinion; I am not trying to justify anything by it.
>
> Please take a deep breath and stop tossing accusation around if you
> want to be taken seriously.
- Agreed, sorry.