This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: internal-error: insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Nick Roberts'" <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>,"'Andrew Cagney'" <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:17:03 -0000
- Subject: RE: internal-error: insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-owner On Behalf Of Nick Roberts
> Sent: 20 January 2005 00:53
> > > Well symtab = 0x0 looks unassigned to me.
> >
> > More likely not-found, what's at that address?
>
> Whats at 0x0?! Are you winding me up, or is it some kind of offset?
:) I suspect he means "at the address given for pc= in the same function
call".
> > > #1 0x080fbdda in insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal (sr_sal=
> > > {symtab = 0x0, section = 0x0, line = 0, pc = 134872212, end = 0},
sr_id=
> > > {stack_addr = 3221220224, code_addr = 134872206, special_addr = 0,
stack_addr_p = 1, code_addr_p = 1, special_addr_p = 0}) at infrun.c:2672
> >
> > Well symtab = 0x0 looks unassigned to me.
> More likely not-found, what's at that address?
i.e. the symtab value is 0 because the lookup didn't find any entry
corresponding to the pc= address; what symbol table entry _ought_ to have been
found but wasn't?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....