This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
- From: Kip Macy <kmacy at fsmware dot com>
- To: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:32:20 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
- References: <BE01F034.8807%schlie@comcast.net>
Similar alternatives have been discussed previously and decided against.
Check the archives for details.
-Kip
> Or how about a basic scheme (<keyword> <expression> ...) syntax, can't get
> much simpler or more flexible than that, not to mention it's fairly straight
> forward easy to read/parse/extend and may realativly easily accomplished by
> imbedding an open-source basic scheme interpreter, vs re-inventing the
> wheel; nearly eliminating the necessity for steps 1, 2; and longer term
> could easily eliminate gdb's present less than flexible command interpreter,
> as there's truly no good reason for the two to be distinct. (Not a new
> notion; but possibly timely and arguably far more productive than developing
> yet another yet another syntax/language/intepreter/etc.)
>
>
>
>
>
>