This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
gcc/intl vs. src/intl
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: 16 Nov 2004 20:53:05 -0500
- Subject: gcc/intl vs. src/intl
So, I notice that gcc/intl and src/intl are pretty different. And I
wonder how this can possibly work in the context of uberbaum. I
suppose it will work fine on a host on which all the intl code can be
found in libc with no other dependencies--such as GNU/Linux. On such
a host the intl directory will not be built, and code will simply link
with -lc. But on a host in which gcc/intl requires -liconv--such as
NetBSD, or Cygwin--the differing expectations of gcc/intl and src/intl
will cause conflict.
Has anybody looked into resolving this? Presumably the correct
short-term fix is to bring gcc/intl over to src/intl, and update the
Makefiles accordingly. Presumably the long-term fix would to keep
intl in sync as we keep libiberty in sync. Does anybody have a better
idea?
Ian