This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: infrun.c:2642: internal-error:insert_step_resume_breakpoint_at_sal: Assertion `step_resume_breakpoint ==NULL' failed.


Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:

> The "step on breakpoint; ..." tests,

I can't find any such test in gdb.base.

> based on your description, exercise just that senario.  They run to a
> breakpoint, wait for a signal to be come pending, and then try to step
> et.al.
>
> Sounds like more is going on?

Perhaps the key point is that the signal (SIGIO) is silently passed to the
inferiour by gdb.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]