This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, bob at brasko dot net, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:08:45 +0300
Subject: Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
References: <20040825154348.GA19533@white> <412E5221.8010601@gnu.org><20040826212516.GA21451@white> <412E683C.nail8HL2532EK@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:46:20 -0400
> From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Again I say, I want the printed grammar in gdb.texinfo to be as close as
> possible to something that a front-end writer can stick into bison and
> *use*.

The grammar should be indeed in the manual, abut there's nothing wrong
to have there several grammars (e.g., LALR(1) and LL(1)).  If that
gets too long, we can always make an appendix and put them there.

Note that the current ``grammar'' in the MI documentation, at least as
far as I'm concerned, is meant to be an informal introduction of the
MI syntax, not a rigurous grammar description.

References:
- GDB/MI Output Syntax
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: GDB/MI Output Syntax
  - From: Michael Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]