This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Technical criteria for retaining symbol readers
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com
- Date: 23 Jun 2004 13:43:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Technical criteria for retaining symbol readers
- References: <40D70123.9060308@gnu.org>
Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org> writes:
> I'd like to see us establish clear technical criteria against which
> symtab readers are measured. Those that don't meet the criteria, either
> being fixed or removed.
>
> As an example, should it be a requirement that all symbol-readers use
> the build-symtab framework?
That would be good.
I'd also like to have some kind of requirement for testability. For
example, I have no way (that I know of) to evaluate changes to
nlmread.c, but that shouldn't mean that I mustn't change anything it
depends on. Perhaps we should require that, in order to be retained,
symbol readers have a contact person who can give GDB developers
access to a machine that actually uses that format. (A complete sim
toolchain being available would be an easy way to satisfy this
requirement.)