This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++/Java regressions

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:

> It does make sense, but I see Michael's concern.  If you look at the
> complete GDB output in this case, you get roughly:
> Stopped at breakpoint 1, A::bar ()		for A::bar()
> Stopped at breakpoint 1, A::bar ()		for A::bar() const
> Stopped at breakpoint 1, A::bar (a = 1)		for A::bar(int)

Ah.

> I still think the demangler should return A::bar.  If we want GDB's
> output to be unambiguous then GDB is the right place to print the
> const.  Without debug info we may not have it... but who really cares?

It's certainly easy for me to do it either way, and I doubt anybody
other than the GDB group really cares, so y'all just tell me what to
do.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]