This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions
What would that mean, anyway? Since there's no clear thread we're
talking about... it could be p:TID:REG:VALUE but I don't see the use :)
I do: Don't write anything back until the continue, or a flush vis:
Right, something like that. As above I guess it would be C:04 instead
I didn't want to take x because of the logical parallel to X. How
about picking a prefix for all new "long" commands? I was going to use
v for "verbose".
Ah! Sounds good, doesn't actually mean anything ... :-)
I'll give this a whirl this week.