This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: (remote) hellishly slow single stepping over library calls


On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 03:24:30PM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > > Would this problem also exist with the normal remote protocol?  (stupid
> > > users...clicking step instead of next....;-)
> >
> > What about using the T-format with a value of PC to report status, instead
> > of using the S-format, for the purpose.
> 
> We're not using gdb's remote protocol but rather our own.  I see from
> remote.c though that T-format is just an expedited reply with just a signal
> and the appropriate registers.  I'm assuming that each target would be in
> charge of knowing what it needs to put in these replies and when to use
> them.

Yes, that's how it works.

> I'll look into implementing that sort of thing on our end.

It should be pretty straightforward to do.  When you get the right
registers, it's quite effective, too.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]