This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: <cpu>-frame.c, frame/<cpu>.c, config/<cpu>/frame.c, ...
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 04 May 2003 09:41:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: <cpu>-frame.c, frame/<cpu>.c, config/<cpu>/frame.c, ...
- References: <3EB48526.9060104@redhat.com>
On Sat, 03 May 2003 23:12:38 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
> Since MarkK is threatening to get the i386 using the new frame code,
> now is probably the time to think about where all these frame modules
> should live:
> d10v-frame.[hc]:
> frame/<cpu>.[hc]:
> config/<cpu>/frame.[hc]:
I don't care too much, myself, but one difference between the middle
and last choices is that the middle choice would generalize to
non-cpu-specific stuff; do we want to eventually have, say, a
directory containing all the different debug readers? (How many frame
modules will there be, anyways?)
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu