This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: simple.c and symfile.c are inconsistent (interps-20030202-branch)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Nick Roberts <nick at nick dot uklinux dot net>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:58:15 -0500
- Subject: Re: simple.c and symfile.c are inconsistent (interps-20030202-branch)
- References: <16014.1326.516900.483245@nick.uklinux.net>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 11:20:30PM +0100, Nick Roberts wrote:
>
> I have previously checked out and successfully compiled gdb+dejagnu on the
> branch tagged interps-20030202-branch. I can't compile my latest update as
> simple.c (CVS version 1.7) defines bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents
> with 4 arguments while symfile.c (CVS version 1.85.2.1) calls it with 3.
>
> Nick
>
>
> gcc -c -g -O2 -I. -I. -I./config -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/share/locale\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./../include/opcode -I./../readline/.. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include -I../intl -I./../intl -DMI_OUT=1 -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wuninitialized symfile.c
> symfile.c: In function `symfile_relocate_debug_section':
> symfile.c:bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents3604: too few arguments to function `bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents'
FYI I updated GDB match to match BFD the following morning; must've
been a merge in between?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer