This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: DejaGNU vs snapshots [drow@mvista.com: Re: [5.3] What's the hold up?]
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: drow at mvista dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:00:28 -0600
- Subject: Re: DejaGNU vs snapshots [drow@mvista.com: Re: [5.3] What's the hold up?]
About this patch for the dejagnu droppings:
--- src/dejagnu/Makefile.am 2002-04-21 04:46:47.000000000 -0400
+++ tsrc/dejagnu/Makefile.am 2002-11-20 16:35:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -34,10 +34,13 @@
# We don't use SUBDIRS, so the excample or test cases don't get built
# by default for a "make all".
clean-local:
- cd doc ; $(MAKE) clean
cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) clean
cd example ; $(MAKE) clean
+distclean-local:
+ cd testsuite ; $(MAKE) distclean
+ cd example ; $(MAKE) distclean
+
I started down this path, but it needs more work. The problem is
that dejagnu/example/calc/Makefile.in does not remove config.status
when it does a distclean. I tried regenerating this file from
dejagnu/example/calc/Makefile.am, but various versions of automake
gave me attitude in various ways.
Now my plan is:
(1) read the autoconf/automake/libtool book
(2) do a big cleanup in cvs dejagnu
(3) import to sourceware
But that's going to take a while, so I'm going to fall back and do
something cheap so that our tarballs work. Probably revive this patch:
revision 1.2
date: 2000/04/19 02:28:55; author: cagney; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
Add directory example to SUBDIRS.
That worked for two years and then got overwritten by an import.
Michael C