This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: drow at mvista dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:02:57 -0600
- Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
Daniel J writes:
> In that case I'd want "broken in all GCC's" to be open rather than
> suspended. Does this bother anyone?
If "external" is a class, it's okay with me if some of them
are "open" and some of them are "suspended".
I wish the state was an indicator of who we are waiting for:
open -> waiting for gdb investigator
analyzed -> waiting for gdb patch-writer
external -> waiting for external issue to be fixed
suspended -> waiting for some miscellaneous condition
feedback -> waiting for original user
closed -> not waiting
But since we're headed for 'external' as a class rather than a state,
this isn't going to happen.
Michael C