This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Pipe question (mmm)
That\'s a good idea, Stanley. I have thought about it, but I didn\'t know
the command.
Mensaje citado por: Stanley Gambarin <stanley@apogee.com>:
> it is unlikely that sending \\\"quit\\\\n\\\" down to GDB will work,
> since it will take some time for GDB to reply to \'quit\' command.
> The solution that work for me (in a very similar situation), is to
> issue following commands:
>
> > set confirm off
> > quit
>
> The \'confirm\' command is used to confirm dangerous operations;
> disabling it will tell GDB to just go ahead and quit (killing
inferior, if
> there is one present).
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> -- stanley
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <a2782@dis.ulpgc.es>
> To: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Pipe question (mmm)
>
>
> > Thanks again to Eli (I have removed the bug of strcat and the
constant
> > string) and Michael C for their effort.
> >
> > It\\\'s important to realize that gdb asks to confirm in several
points of
> > its execution (I will consider it from now). But I was using a very
> > short code and this prompt didn\\\'t appear (and, as I said, GDB is
ending
> > properly). I wonder if it can be a problem with my development GUI
> > (Kylix 3.0 Open Edition) or something I may be missing. Well, if
anyone
> > knows something new, don\\\'t hesitate to help me!
> >
> > Ciao!
> >
>