This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Pierre Muller <muller at cerbere dot u-strasbg dot fr>,rda at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 17:48:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list
- References: <5.0.2.1.2.20021127095625.02489ac0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <3DE4E23E.5000104@redhat.com> <20021201212149.GC12876@nevyn.them.org>
No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project)
and it should continue to be discussed here.
I really wish we could come to some resolution about the overlap.
Should we sacrifice the FSF-owned gdbserver project in favor of
extending RDA? As it is, there's a substantial amount of duplicated
effort. I hate seeing effort wasted.
gdb/gdbserver/ is the FSF's (and hence GDB's) remote debug agent. There
is no benefit to the FSF, and its objectives, in replacing something (C)
FSF with something (C) Red Hat.
Andrew